Question: In 2 0 0 9 and again in 2 0 1 4 , Apple was implicated in alleged human right's violations at Pegatron and Foxconn

In 2009 and again in 2014, Apple was implicated in alleged human right's violations at Pegatron and Foxconn factories respectively. Although Apple had promised to overcome these issues, the situation had clearly proven to be difficult to overturn. Address the questions below with regard to what path forward Apple should have considered as it responded to these allegations and to the need to make changes to their outsourcing and offshoring programs.
1. Identify the multiple levels of analysis at play for Apple as it addresses the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) challenges in its supply chain.
2. Is Apple responsible for the alleged human rights violations that occurred?
3. Would onshoring, insourcing, or a combination of the two represent a suitable response to Apple's problems?
4. If Apple continues on the current path, what should it do differently?
5. Is it reasonable for Apple to apply different ethical standards to different countries?
6. Should firms such as Apple maximize their profits, or should they sacrifice some profits to do good?
7. Have these CSR problems at Apple had a meaningful impact on their bottom line?
8. What is the role of media, including social media, in shaping CSR expectations?
9. Does Apple face an industry-specific, or do the same issues appear in other industries?
10. If you were in the position of Jeff Williams, what, if anything, would you do differently?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!