Question: In 2 0 0 9 and again in 2 0 1 4 , Apple was implicated in alleged human right's violations at Pegatron and Foxconn
In and again in Apple was implicated in alleged human right's violations at Pegatron and Foxconn factories respectively. Although Apple had promised to overcome these issues, the situation had clearly proven to be difficult to overturn. Address the questions below with regard to what path forward Apple should have considered as it responded to these allegations and to the need to make changes to their outsourcing and offshoring programs.
Identify the multiple levels of analysis at play for Apple as it addresses the Corporate Social Responsibility CSR challenges in its supply chain.
Is Apple responsible for the alleged human rights violations that occurred?
Would onshoring, insourcing, or a combination of the two represent a suitable response to Apple's problems?
If Apple continues on the current path, what should it do differently?
Is it reasonable for Apple to apply different ethical standards to different countries?
Should firms such as Apple maximize their profits, or should they sacrifice some profits to do good?
Have these CSR problems at Apple had a meaningful impact on their bottom line?
What is the role of media, including social media, in shaping CSR expectations?
Does Apple face an industryspecific, or do the same issues appear in other industries?
If you were in the position of Jeff Williams, what, if anything, would you do differently?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
