Question: In a blog post from 2015, titled: Don't Strike Down the Safe Harbor Based on Inaccurate Views About U.S. Intelligence Law(https://iapp.org/news/a/dont-strike-down-the-safe-harbor-based-on-inaccurate-views-on-u-s-intelligence-law/) , Law Professor Peter
In a blog post from 2015, titled: Don't Strike Down the Safe Harbor Based on Inaccurate Views About U.S. Intelligence Law(https://iapp.org/news/a/dont-strike-down-the-safe-harbor-based-on-inaccurate-views-on-u-s-intelligence-law/) , Law Professor Peter Swire explains that the CJEU relied on a faulty description of U.S. laws and practices when reaching its conclusions in the Schrems case. What are the key components of Professor Swire's arguments? Are they convincing?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
