In a civil trial for wrongful death, the plaintiff (the widow of a man killed by a
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
The plaintiff proffered four prior incidents similar to the defen- dant's conduct in the instant litigation. The defendant argued that to admit any, some, or all would be unfairly prejudicial. The plaintiff argued that "unfairly" was not the test but rather that the test was very prejudicial. What should the judge rule?
The plaintiff argued that the defendant's prior crane swinging demonstrated both an absence of mistake and a pattern. The defendant argued that he had an involuntary ticks that caused the crane to swing and because the new rule omitted the words or otherwise his conduct should be precluded. What should the judge do?
Related Book For
Smith and Roberson Business Law
ISBN: 978-0538473637
15th Edition
Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Posted Date: