In a Clayton Act Section 7-based challenge to a merger, the court's adoption of a narrow relevant market definition will generally make it easier for the plaintiff to prove probable anticompetitive effect than if the court had adopted a broad relevant market definition. (T/F)

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS TRUE The CLAYTON ACT 7 verifies MERGERS and acquisitions unlawful Fundamental... View the full answer