In Arnold v$.$ Riddell $(1995),$ a high school football player who became quadriplegic due to his neck injury brought a product liability claim against the major sport equipment company. One of the plaintiff's arguments was that the defendant failed to warn the injured party of something. What was the warning that the defendant allegedly did not make according to the plaintiff?

Group of answer choices

The helmet might be used as weapon by opponents in case of a brawl in the football field.

The football helmet cannot be used for higher than a middle school level competition.

The football helmet was defective because was not made in the U$.$S$.$A$.$

The fact that the football helmet could not protect them from so$-$called "crown impact."