Question: In Balombin v . Orrell, 2 0 2 1 ABPC 6 4 ( CanLII ) , the Plaintiff relied on an Alberta Court of Appeal

In Balombin v. Orrell, 2021 ABPC 64(CanLII), the Plaintiff relied on an Alberta Court of Appeal
decision that set out the elements of the tort of inducing breach of contract. According to that
decision as summarized in Balombin, how any elements are there? (enter the number):
Answer
In Marthaller v. O'Hearn, 2022 ABPC 10(CanLII), the judge decided that:
Select one:
a. the Plaintiff successfully proved negligence and nuisance, but not strict liability.
b. the Plaintiff's claim in negligence failed.
c. the Plaintiff's claim in strict liability succeeded.
d. the Plaintiff's claim in nuisance succeeded.Using your Legal Links, locate Alberta's Partnership Act. Under the Act, the word "business"
includes every trade, occupation and
(enter the missing word):
Find the March 1,2022 article "Is Incorporation Right for your Business?" written by Jordan Thorne
on the LawNow website. According to this article:
Select one:
a. A customer can sue a company's shareholders if the company defaults on a contract with
that customer.
b. Most corporate registries require a company to file a report every 5 years to remain in good
standing.
c. A company can continue in perpetuity.
d. Incorporation is not a useful estate planning tool for long-standing family-owned
businesses.Find the Law Society of Alberta 2023 Hearing Committee Report for Ivie Ihensekhien-Eraga. In
November of 2019 Ms. Eraga was charged criminally for intentionally misleading a police officer by
creating a false witness statement. Name the criminal charge (two words):
AnswerYour best friend Ibrahim got seriously injured at a trampoline park recently. After
researching Alberta's occupier liability legislation, you know that it is TRUE that:
Select one:
a. the common duty of care owed to visitors does not apply to the condition of the trampoline
park.
b. the occupier of the trampoline park can rely on an exclusion of liability in an express
agreement, even where no steps were taken to bring it to a visitor's attention.
c. Ibrahim will be considered a visitor at the trampoline park, if he was lawfully present there
by virtue of an express or implied term of a contract.
d. the occupier of the trampoline park must discharge the common duty of care to a visitor,
even where the visitor willingly accepted the risks.
After reading Alberta's contributory negligence legislation, choose the statement below that
is FALSE:
Select one:
a. The legislation indicates that certain questions in every action are questions of fact.
b. Where a person may be partly responsible for the damages claimed, but is not yet a party
to the lawsuit, that party may be added as a defendant on such terms that are determined
to be just.
c. A person may be held liable for damage or loss even where that person's fault has not
contributed to it.
d. The name of the legislation is the Contributory Negligence Act.Question 8
Not yet
answered
Marked out of
Flag
question
Question 9
Not yet
answered
Marked out of
Flag
question
Locate Ellis v City of Lethbridge, 2020 ABQB 783(CanLII). Which part of her body did the Plaintiff
injure?
Ans
Read "Ride at Your Own Risk: Amusement parks and liability", dated July 31,2021, written by Lee
Klippenstein. The author outlines four rules that guide the interpretation of liability waivers, as
found by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in the Apps case. What is the third rule? (do not
enter the number or period at the end):
Answer:

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!