Question: In Balombin v . Orrell, 2 0 2 1 ABPC 6 4 ( CanLII ) , the Plaintiff relied on an Alberta Court of Appeal
In Balombin v Orrell, ABPC CanLII the Plaintiff relied on an Alberta Court of Appeal
decision that set out the elements of the tort of inducing breach of contract. According to that
decision as summarized in Balombin, how any elements are there? enter the number:
Answer
In Marthaller v O'Hearn, ABPC CanLII the judge decided that:
Select one:
a the Plaintiff successfully proved negligence and nuisance, but not strict liability.
b the Plaintiff's claim in negligence failed.
c the Plaintiff's claim in strict liability succeeded.
d the Plaintiff's claim in nuisance succeeded.Using your Legal Links, locate Alberta's Partnership Act. Under the Act, the word "business"
includes every trade, occupation and
enter the missing word:
Find the March article Is Incorporation Right for your Business?" written by Jordan Thorne
on the LawNow website. According to this article:
Select one:
a A customer can sue a company's shareholders if the company defaults on a contract with
that customer.
b Most corporate registries require a company to file a report every years to remain in good
standing.
c A company can continue in perpetuity.
d Incorporation is not a useful estate planning tool for longstanding familyowned
businesses.Find the Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report for Ivie IhensekhienEraga. In
November of Ms Eraga was charged criminally for intentionally misleading a police officer by
creating a false witness statement. Name the criminal charge two words:
AnswerYour best friend Ibrahim got seriously injured at a trampoline park recently. After
researching Alberta's occupier liability legislation, you know that it is TRUE that:
Select one:
a the common duty of care owed to visitors does not apply to the condition of the trampoline
park.
b the occupier of the trampoline park can rely on an exclusion of liability in an express
agreement, even where no steps were taken to bring it to a visitor's attention.
c Ibrahim will be considered a visitor at the trampoline park, if he was lawfully present there
by virtue of an express or implied term of a contract.
d the occupier of the trampoline park must discharge the common duty of care to a visitor,
even where the visitor willingly accepted the risks.
After reading Alberta's contributory negligence legislation, choose the statement below that
is FALSE:
Select one:
a The legislation indicates that certain questions in every action are questions of fact.
b Where a person may be partly responsible for the damages claimed, but is not yet a party
to the lawsuit, that party may be added as a defendant on such terms that are determined
to be just.
c A person may be held liable for damage or loss even where that person's fault has not
contributed to it
d The name of the legislation is the Contributory Negligence Act.Question
Not yet
answered
Marked out of
Flag
question
Question
Not yet
answered
Marked out of
Flag
question
Locate Ellis v City of Lethbridge, ABQB CanLII Which part of her body did the Plaintiff
injure?
Ans
Read "Ride at Your Own Risk: Amusement parks and liability", dated July written by Lee
Klippenstein. The author outlines four rules that guide the interpretation of liability waivers, as
found by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in the Apps case. What is the third rule? do not
enter the number or period at the end:
Answer:
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
