In Chapter $10,$ Luker talks about causality and the problems with the canonical approach. Which statement best describes her critique? $q,$

Causality may be flawed, but it is not an area of concern for qualitative $("$salsa dancing"$)$ research.

Cannonicals are right that causality is linear and so qualitative data doesn't have any explanatory power.

Causality is not simply linear, so we need to understand different patterns in social life.

All of the above.