In Chapter 10 on page 474.Read the case study "Case One FBI Orders Apple to Unlock iPhone".

Write a one page summary answering the Critical Thinking Questions below:

1. Why did Apple object to the court order in this case? What was the government's rationale for compelling Apple to comply with the order?
2. Do you think Americans should be willing to surrender some of their privacy for increased security by allowing backdoors that enable law enforcement access to smartphones and other devices after a search warrant has been issued? Why or why not?
3. The FBI and Apple are involved in similar disputes in other cases, including one in New York involving an alleged drug conspiracy. Shortly before the government dropped its legal action against Apple in the San Bernardino case, the judge in the New York case ruled against the government, rejecting the argument that the All Writs Act gave prosecutors the authority to compel Apple to bypass the lock on the seized phone. Do your opinions about the issues involved in the San Bernardino case change when they arise in connection with a case that does not have national security implications? Why or why not?