In Chapter $4,$ we learned about the Exclusionary Rule, Fruit of the Poisonous Tree, exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule $($Good faith exception and more$)$ and the court decisions that created them. The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained by the police in violation of the FourthAmendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures is not admissible in court.There are four categories of exceptions to the exclusionary rule: good faith, inevitable discovery, purged taint, and independent source.The exclusionary rule does not apply in the following situations or types of proceedings:violations of the knock$-$and$-$announce rule, private searches, grand jury investigations,sentencing$,$ arrests based on probable cause that violate state law, when only agency rules are violated, noncriminal proceedings, and parole revocation hearings.For this Discussion Board, assume the role of a police officer. You have been dispatched to and are responding to a complaint of loud music coming from an apartment. You knock on the door but nobody can hear you. The door is unlocked and you enter to see a large cache of illegal drugs.Would the drugs be admissible in evidence? Give your reasons why or why not. Include court cases that you find that can back up your answer.You also must REPLY to another student's post in order to earn up to the full amount of points. Your reply to another student's post MUST be substantial. Do not just post "I agree" as you will NOT earn up to the full amount of points. When I grade your Discussion Boards, I will post COMMENTS along with the points you have earned $-$ so please be sure to read these in your Gradebook!Remember $-$ no text messaging abbreviations and correct spelling and grammar!!