Question: In class, we developed a simple model with mug utility and money utility, and we derived implications for the reservation values of buyers, sellers, and
In class, we developed a simple model with mug utility and money utility, and we derived implications for the reservation values of buyers, sellers, and choosers in endowmenteffect experiments. This question asks you to think through several variants of that model. For all parts, assume that the person has wealth $ and that Total UtilityMug UtilityMoney Utility
a Let's begin with the case studied in class: Suppose that money utility is and that mug utility is where
i Derive the reservation values for buyers, sellers, and choosers as a function of and
ii Discuss how and why the three types differ. If it helps, consider the special case when and
b Now, let's introduce loss aversion over money: Suppose that mug utility is as in part a but now suppose that money utility is where and
i Derive the reservation values for buyers, sellers, and choosers as a function of and
ii Discuss how and why the three types differ. If it helps, consider the special case when and
c Next, instead of assuming loss aversion over money, let's assume diminishing marginal utility from money: Suppose again that mug utility is as in part a but now suppose that money utility is To simplify things, assume that
i Derive the reservation values for buyers, sellers, and choosers.
ii Discuss how and why the three types differ.
d Finally, let's keep diminishing marginal utility from money, but now eliminate loss aversion over mugs: Suppose that mug utility is and that money utility is
i Derive the reservation values for buyers, sellers; and choosers.
ii Discuss how and why the three types differ.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
