In class we've talked about using an average score across items while the Wonderlic summed correct responses across items. The data below corresponds to the six-item scale employee engagement scale presented in the notes. Data were measured using a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Dashes indicate items the respondent did not complete (for whatever reason). a. What would you estimate each respondent's engagement to be using an averaging rule? i. Respondent A : ii. Respondent B : b. What would you estimate each respondent's engagement to be using a summation rule? i. Respondent A: ii. Respondent B: c. How do the two approaches compare? Which seems most applicable and why