In dire need

U.S. Source (reflects our present Business Plan): Investment - $800 Million for re-tooling an existing facility where the new vehicle will be produced Contribution Costs - All shown in USD Mansle Source: Investment - $1.2 Billion will enable us to build a new facility where the new vehicle will be produced Contribution Cost - All costs sourced in MLE Data shown has been converted using the noted exchange rate as assumed in our latest business plan 57,000 Deuce Automotive Global Finance Team KEY DATA FOR VEHICLE FOOTPRINT STUDY Gamma Tau Program - Launch Date January 2023 Manufacturing Source U.S Mansie Sales Location U.S. Mansle U.S. Mansle Annual Sales (Units) 43,000 57,000 43,000 Investment (Mils) S 800 NA NA $ 1.200 Contribution Cost Impact (Per Unit) Material Cost $ (22,000) $ (20,800) $ (19,000) $ (18,500) Freight (1.200) (2.800) (2,800) (1.200) Variable Labor (1,500) (1.500) (750) (750) Duty & Tax (500) (11.000) (1.100) (3.600) Total Contribution Margin Impact S (25,200) $ (36,100) $ (23,650) $ (24.050) Exchange Rate (MLE:USD) NA NA 8.0 a/ 8.0 al --- Note: All costs shown are in USD. Exchange rate used to convert Mansle based costs to USD is shown. a/ All costs (incl. investment) in Mansle localization scenario are sourced in MLE I need your help in preparing a study to localize our product Gamma Tau to the country of Mansle. Mansle's currency (abbreviated MLE) has weakened considerably in the past year against the U.S. dollar (USD) causing the profit translation of our revenue from our Mansle sold units to degrade significantly. The leadership team has requested that we find a way to mitigate this currency volatility. One way we can do this is better match the currency of our costs to the currency of our revenue. As our sales in Mansle constitute a larger mix of the total global sales of our multi-vehicle portfolio going forward, localizing Gamma Tau and creating some MLE cost exposure may help balance our overall currency portfolio and minimize the profit impact of volatile currency movements. See the note below for additional texture and key financial data that will be required for the analysis, Your analysis should provide a profit impact sensitivity analysis using the range of MLE:USD provided below Here are my guidelines / tips for you: 1. Your profit impact analysis should focus on a decision analysis for the localization alternative. The U.S. sourcing location is in our present Business Plan. Provide an incremental view to our Business Plan shown in $ Millions, 2. The localization alternative will have no impact on our sales revenue, so all the data that I have sent over is cost related. There is no need to include revenue in the incremental decision analysis. 3. Given the tight timing on this request, assume a One Period Analysis for this study (i.e., calculate the profit impact for one year only). At a later date, with better data and an aligned cost of capital, we will analyze the entire five- year product cycle 4. Lee from the Corporate Economics team suggested that we study a three-point range for MLE:USD (7:1, 8:1, and 9:1). As you will see, there are trade-offs with the localization alternative. Let me know your recommendation based on the available data. And let me know other risks or concerns (financial and non-financial) that we should communicate to our leadership team. U.S. Source (reflects our present Business Plan): Investment - $800 Million for re-tooling an existing facility where the new vehicle will be produced Contribution Costs - All shown in USD Mansle Source: Investment - $1.2 Billion will enable us to build a new facility where the new vehicle will be produced Contribution Cost - All costs sourced in MLE Data shown has been converted using the noted exchange rate as assumed in our latest business plan 57,000 Deuce Automotive Global Finance Team KEY DATA FOR VEHICLE FOOTPRINT STUDY Gamma Tau Program - Launch Date January 2023 Manufacturing Source U.S Mansie Sales Location U.S. Mansle U.S. Mansle Annual Sales (Units) 43,000 57,000 43,000 Investment (Mils) S 800 NA NA $ 1.200 Contribution Cost Impact (Per Unit) Material Cost $ (22,000) $ (20,800) $ (19,000) $ (18,500) Freight (1.200) (2.800) (2,800) (1.200) Variable Labor (1,500) (1.500) (750) (750) Duty & Tax (500) (11.000) (1.100) (3.600) Total Contribution Margin Impact S (25,200) $ (36,100) $ (23,650) $ (24.050) Exchange Rate (MLE:USD) NA NA 8.0 a/ 8.0 al --- Note: All costs shown are in USD. Exchange rate used to convert Mansle based costs to USD is shown. a/ All costs (incl. investment) in Mansle localization scenario are sourced in MLE I need your help in preparing a study to localize our product Gamma Tau to the country of Mansle. Mansle's currency (abbreviated MLE) has weakened considerably in the past year against the U.S. dollar (USD) causing the profit translation of our revenue from our Mansle sold units to degrade significantly. The leadership team has requested that we find a way to mitigate this currency volatility. One way we can do this is better match the currency of our costs to the currency of our revenue. As our sales in Mansle constitute a larger mix of the total global sales of our multi-vehicle portfolio going forward, localizing Gamma Tau and creating some MLE cost exposure may help balance our overall currency portfolio and minimize the profit impact of volatile currency movements. See the note below for additional texture and key financial data that will be required for the analysis, Your analysis should provide a profit impact sensitivity analysis using the range of MLE:USD provided below Here are my guidelines / tips for you: 1. Your profit impact analysis should focus on a decision analysis for the localization alternative. The U.S. sourcing location is in our present Business Plan. Provide an incremental view to our Business Plan shown in $ Millions, 2. The localization alternative will have no impact on our sales revenue, so all the data that I have sent over is cost related. There is no need to include revenue in the incremental decision analysis. 3. Given the tight timing on this request, assume a One Period Analysis for this study (i.e., calculate the profit impact for one year only). At a later date, with better data and an aligned cost of capital, we will analyze the entire five- year product cycle 4. Lee from the Corporate Economics team suggested that we study a three-point range for MLE:USD (7:1, 8:1, and 9:1). As you will see, there are trade-offs with the localization alternative. Let me know your recommendation based on the available data. And let me know other risks or concerns (financial and non-financial) that we should communicate to our leadership team