In making the accept/reject decision, each of the capital budgeting decision methods provides decision makers with...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
In making the accept/reject decision, each of the capital budgeting decision methods provides decision makers with a somewhat different piece of relevant information. Payback and discounted payback provide an indication of both the risk and the liquidity of a project NPV is important because it gives a direct measure of the dollar benefit (on a present value basis) of the project to shareholders, so it is regarded as the best single measure of profitability. IRR also measures profitability, but expressed as a percentage rate of return, which many decision makers prefer. Further, IRR contains information regarding a project's "safety margin." The modified IRR has all the virtues of the IRR, and it avoids the multiple rate of return problem. The PI measures profitability relative to the cost of a project-it shows the "bang per buck." Like the IRR, it gives an indication of the project's risk, for a high PI means that cash flows could fall quite a bit and the project would still be profitable. Quantitative methods such as NPV and IRR should be considered as an aid to informed decisions but not as a substitute for sound managerial judgment In a perfectly competitive economy, there would be no positive NPV projects-all companies would have the same opportunities, and competition would quickly eliminate any positive NPV. Positive NPV projects must be due to some imperfection in the marketplace, and the longer the life of the project, the longer that imperfection must last. Therefore, managers should be able to identify the imperfection and explain why it will persist before accepting that a project will really have a positive NPV. If you can't identify the reason a project has a positive projected NPV, then its actual NPV will probably not be positive. Positive NPV projects don't just happen-they result from hard work to develop some competitive advantage. Som e competitive advantages last longer than others, with their durability depending upon competitors' ability to replicate them. A number of studies regarding firm s' use of capital budgeting methods have been published. The general conclusion one can reach from these studies is that large firms should and do use the procedures we recommend, and that managers of small firms, especially managers with aspirations for future growth, should at least understand DCF procedures well enough to make rational decisions about using or not using them. Moreover, as computer technology makes it easier and less expensive for small firm s to use DCF methods, and as more and more of their competitors begin using these methods, survival will necessitate increased DCF usage. An important aspect of the capital budgeting process is the post-audit, which involves comparing actual results with those predicted by the project's sponsors and explaining why any differences occurred. The results of the post-audit help to improve forecasts, increase efficiency of the firm's operations, and identify abandonment termination opportunities. The post-audit is not a simple process-a number of factors can cause complications. Each element of the cash flow forecast is subject to uncertainty, so a percentage of all projects undertaken by any reasonably aggressive firm will necessarily go awry. Projects sometim e fail to meet expectations for reasons beyond the control of the operating executives and for reasons that no one could realistically be expected to anticipate. It is often difficult to separate the operating results of one investment from those of a larger system. It is often hard to hand out blame or praise, because the executives who were responsible for launching a given long-term investment may have moved on by the time the results are known The results of post-audits often conclude that (1) the actual NPV s of most cost reduction projects exceed their expected NPV s by a slight amount, (2) expansion projects generally fall short of their expected NPV s by a slight amount, and (3) new product and new market projects fall short by relatively large amounts. The best-run and most successful organizations put great emphasis on post-audits. Let's continue Discussion on this topic In making the accept/reject decision, each of the capital budgeting decision methods provides decision makers with a somewhat different piece of relevant information. Payback and discounted payback provide an indication of both the risk and the liquidity of a project NPV is important because it gives a direct measure of the dollar benefit (on a present value basis) of the project to shareholders, so it is regarded as the best single measure of profitability. IRR also measures profitability, but expressed as a percentage rate of return, which many decision makers prefer. Further, IRR contains information regarding a project's "safety margin." The modified IRR has all the virtues of the IRR, and it avoids the multiple rate of return problem. The PI measures profitability relative to the cost of a project-it shows the "bang per buck." Like the IRR, it gives an indication of the project's risk, for a high PI means that cash flows could fall quite a bit and the project would still be profitable. Quantitative methods such as NPV and IRR should be considered as an aid to informed decisions but not as a substitute for sound managerial judgment In a perfectly competitive economy, there would be no positive NPV projects-all companies would have the same opportunities, and competition would quickly eliminate any positive NPV. Positive NPV projects must be due to some imperfection in the marketplace, and the longer the life of the project, the longer that imperfection must last. Therefore, managers should be able to identify the imperfection and explain why it will persist before accepting that a project will really have a positive NPV. If you can't identify the reason a project has a positive projected NPV, then its actual NPV will probably not be positive. Positive NPV projects don't just happen-they result from hard work to develop some competitive advantage. Som e competitive advantages last longer than others, with their durability depending upon competitors' ability to replicate them. A number of studies regarding firm s' use of capital budgeting methods have been published. The general conclusion one can reach from these studies is that large firms should and do use the procedures we recommend, and that managers of small firms, especially managers with aspirations for future growth, should at least understand DCF procedures well enough to make rational decisions about using or not using them. Moreover, as computer technology makes it easier and less expensive for small firm s to use DCF methods, and as more and more of their competitors begin using these methods, survival will necessitate increased DCF usage. An important aspect of the capital budgeting process is the post-audit, which involves comparing actual results with those predicted by the project's sponsors and explaining why any differences occurred. The results of the post-audit help to improve forecasts, increase efficiency of the firm's operations, and identify abandonment termination opportunities. The post-audit is not a simple process-a number of factors can cause complications. Each element of the cash flow forecast is subject to uncertainty, so a percentage of all projects undertaken by any reasonably aggressive firm will necessarily go awry. Projects sometim e fail to meet expectations for reasons beyond the control of the operating executives and for reasons that no one could realistically be expected to anticipate. It is often difficult to separate the operating results of one investment from those of a larger system. It is often hard to hand out blame or praise, because the executives who were responsible for launching a given long-term investment may have moved on by the time the results are known The results of post-audits often conclude that (1) the actual NPV s of most cost reduction projects exceed their expected NPV s by a slight amount, (2) expansion projects generally fall short of their expected NPV s by a slight amount, and (3) new product and new market projects fall short by relatively large amounts. The best-run and most successful organizations put great emphasis on post-audits. Let's continue Discussion on this topic
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Answer 1 Payback and discounted payback provide an indication of both the risk and the liquidity of a project Payback period is the time period required to recover the initial outlay of a project from ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Intermediate Accounting Reporting and Analysis
ISBN: 978-1285453828
2nd edition
Authors: James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
The term Darwinism is important because it indicates Select one: A. the randomness of existing companies. B. the existence of a higher intelligence that promotes success. C. that the surviving...
-
Information regarding many approaches to budgeting can be found on the Web. The following activity investigates the merits of zero-based budgeting, as discussed by Michael LaFaive, Director of...
-
Bayes' theorem is important because it provides a rule for moving from a prior probability to a posterior probability. Elaborate on this statement so that it would be well understood by a fellow...
-
You would like to buy a house in in 16 years and estimate that you will need a deposit of $73,014. You plan to make bi-weekly deposits into an account that you hope will earn 7.05%. How much do you...
-
On January 1, 2010, Parker, Inc., a U.S.-based firm, acquired 100 percent of Suffolk PLC located in Great Britain for consideration paid of 52,000,000 British pounds (£), which was equal to...
-
Foot Loose, Inc., needs to purchase a new shoelace-making machine. Machines Ready has agreed to sell Foot Loose the machine for $22,000 down and four payments of $5,700 to be paid in semiannual...
-
Continuing to focus on evidence associated with the act, concealment, and conversion, use the evidentiary material to continue the examination. In addition, as the examiner also start to think of...
-
Janus Products, Inc., is a merchandising company that sells binders, paper, and other school supplies. The company is planning its cash needs for the third quarter. In the past, Janus Products has...
-
1. Consider 3 a. Draw a tape diagram that represents 3. I b. Use the tape diagram from part (a) to evaluate 3+
-
Suppose that there are p = 4 quality characteristics, and in correlation form all four variables have variance unity and that all pairwise correlation coefficients are 0.9. The in-control value of...
-
You took a $2,876 trip to visit relatives in Europe. You financed it through State Bank and you made a 25% down payment. You financed the remaining amount on an installment plan. What is the amount...
-
Thomas has allocated $48 per month for entertainment expenses, which he uses either to go bowling or to play billiards. One night of bowling costs Thomas $8, and one night of billiards costs Thomas...
-
From a macro-environmental perspective, consider the extent to which digital channels are replacing physical channels.
-
The following facts have been extracted from the 65th Annual Report of Tata Motors Limited for the year 200910. (Necessary simplification has been made wherever required.) By making necessary...
-
Badam Gussain, Vice-President (Accounts) of Sach International Corporation, Singapore, was taken aback when he reviewed the financial performance of the company. He noticed that the sales for the...
-
The number of oil changes conducted by a service station depends on the number of workers as follows: Assume that all inputs (service bins, telephone, and utilities) other than labor are fixed in the...
-
The table below is the YTM of U.S. Treasuries with different maturities on March 22, 2021. 3 mo 6 mo 1 yr. 2 yr. 3 yr. 5 yr. 7 yr. 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.15 0.32 0.87 1.34 a. What is the expected two-year...
-
Hardin Services Co. experienced the following events in 2016: 1. Provided services on account. 2. Collected cash for accounts receivable. 3. Attempted to collect an account and, when unsuccessful,...
-
Would it be desirable to require all companies to use the same depreciation method?
-
Lark Corporation appropriately determined that each of its long term projects represents a single performance obligation that is satisfied over time. At the end of the current year, Lark estimates...
-
On July 1, 2016, Osceola Company retired a metal stamping machine that it had originally purchased for $1,500,000. At December 31, 2015, the machine had a book value of $125,000 and was being...
-
How is the legal infrastructure of a country significant for business?
-
What is legal liability?
-
We have a parliament to pass laws, a government to administer laws, and a police department to enforce laws. Ironically, these potent instruments for the restriction of liberty are necessary for the...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App