Question: In note 2 after the Hambrick case on page 156, Solove and Schwartz address the argument that statutes can indicate a societal recognition of a
In note 2 after the Hambrick case on page 156, Solove and Schwartz address the argument that statutes can indicate a societal recognition of a particular privacy interest. The court rejects this argument.
- Was it correct to do so?
- Aren't statutes passed by democratically elected representatives indicative of the nation's expectations regarding privacy?
- Why or why not?
- What would be the consequences of using statutes as evidence of a reasonable expectation of privacy?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
