Question: In note 2 after the Hambrick case on page 156, Solove and Schwartz address the argument that statutes can indicate a societal recognition of a

In note 2 after the Hambrick case on page 156, Solove and Schwartz address the argument that statutes can indicate a societal recognition of a particular privacy interest. The court rejects this argument.

  • Was it correct to do so?
  • Aren't statutes passed by democratically elected representatives indicative of the nation's expectations regarding privacy?
    • Why or why not?
  • What would be the consequences of using statutes as evidence of a reasonable expectation of privacy?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!