In one paragraph, can you help me rewrite these case descriptions and rule explanations to better focus on what matters from the authority by starting with the conclusion and avoiding citings? Notably, a statement "under oath" has not been listed among those requirements for judicial estoppel. Indeed, although this Court in Caballero mentioned "the sanctity of the oath" in its discussion of judicial estoppel, Caballero, 206 Ill.2d at 80, 276 Ill.Dec. 356, 794 N.E.2d 251 (quoting Bidani v. Lewis, 285 Ill.App.3d 545, 549, 221 Ill.Dec. 452, 675 N.E.2d 647 (1996))), the Court did not subsequently list an oath requirement among the requisites for application of the doctrine. Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum Perlman & Nagelberg v. Loffredi, 342 Ill.App.3d 453, 464, 277 Ill.Dec. 111, 795 N.E.2d 779 (2003); see also Runge, 234 Ill.2d at 132, 334 Ill.Dec. 865, 917 N.E.2d 940; Jones, 223 Ill.2d at 598, 308 Ill.Dec. 402, 861 N.E.2d 967; Department of Transportation v. Coe, 112 Ill.App.3d 506, 510, 68 Ill.Dec. 58, 445 N.E.2d 506 (1983); Smeilis v. Lipkis, 2012 IL App (1st) 103385, 20, 359 Ill.Dec. 862, 967 N.E.2d 892; Boelkes v. Harlem Consolidated School District No. 122, 363 Ill.App.3d 551, 554, 299 Ill.Dec. 753, 842 N.E.2d 790 (2006)