Question: In S _ v Makwanyane _ 1 9 9 5 ( 3 ) SA 3 9 1 ( CC ) , the court stated thatOa

In S_v Makwanyane_1995(3) SA 391(CC), the court stated thatOa A state of necessity was imminent and therefore the plaintiff's conduct was justified.Ob. Killing a person in defence of property mnay have to be reconsidered in view of constitutionalprovisions.Oc. The act in necessity must have been necessary to protect the threatened interest.Od. It is necessary to examine the limits of defence when dealing with the requirements of the attack.
In S_v Makwanyane_1995(3) SA 391(CC), the court stated thatOa A state

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!

Q:

Thomas Plastics is in the process of developing a revolutionary new plastic valve. A new division of the company was formed to develop, manufacture, and market this new product. As of year-end...

Q:

SCHOOL OF LAW L450 - Jurisprudence and Legal Theory - Assignment Student ID Number Mode of study(Full Time, Part Time or Distance) ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR LECTURER'S USE ONLY NO NARRATION MARK...

Q:

Question 1 (Marks: 20) Read the following extract and answer the questions that follow in not more than two (2) pages in length: "JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance (DA) has called on acting...

Q:

Question 1 (Marks: 20) Read the following extract and answer the questions that follow in not more than two (2) pages in length: "JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance (DA) has called on acting...

Q:

5/10/2016 JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES | FindLaw Not a Legal Professional? Visit our consumer site Register | LogIn CASES & CODES PRACTICE MANAGEMENT JOBS & CAREERS LEGAL NEWS Forms FindLaw Caselaw...

Q:

Review lecture, Art of Case Briefing, and read SCOTUS's opinion on Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam. After, write a case brief on Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Thuraissigiam. Because this is a...

Q:

3/21/24, 12:22 AM United States v. Nixon :: 418 U.S. 683 (1974) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center JUSTIA Argued: Decided: July 8, 1974 July 24, 1974 Annotation PRIMARY HOLDING The President cannot...

Q:

The Question is the first image where it says For this Exercise. The last picture gives the Memo Template. EXERCISE 3. WRITING AN INTERNAL MEMO For this exercise you'll write an internal office...

Q:

can i get help in this question please its over a court case. im supposed to explain the law of Unconscionably as decided by the court and then the facts leading up to contact being unfoceable, then...

Q:

Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) Argued: December 6, 1904 Decided: February 20, 1905 Argued: December 5, 1904 Decided: February 19, 1905 Annotation PRIMARY HOLDING A state may enact a...

Q:

1. The name of the case: this generally includes an abbreviation of names of usually at least two parties and is the method by which a particular case is specifically identified in part; 2. The name...

Q:

What consequences are students most likely to suffer as a result of too much stress?

Q:

Hana Coffee Company roasts and packs coffee beans. The process begins by placing the coffee beans in the Roasting Department. From the Roasting Department, the coffee beans are then transferred to...

Q:

9. If a company's current ratio is 1.5 and its current liabilities are $200,000, what are its current assets? need a helpful...???

Q:

Bond X is noncallable and has 20 years to maturity, a 9% annual coupon, and a $1,000 par value. Your required return on Bond X is 12%; if you buy it, you plan to hold it for 5 years. You (and the...