In State v$.$ Nelson, $499$ N$.$W$.2$d $512($Minn$.$ Ct$.$ App. $1993)$

the pet rooster was confiscated from Tammie Nelson by the local police

Judcge Schumacher upheld the conviction and determined that the pet rooster was livestock under the ordinance

The language of the Maplewood ordinance included poultry as part of the definition of livestock

Judge Schumacher reversed the lower court conviction and determined that the pet rooster was not livestock under the ordinance