In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button.

Original Source Material:

APT was compared with numerous extant methodologies, including the linear models approach and event history analysis. The fundamental difference between APT and these other approaches is that no particular mathematical model is assumed in APT. In APT a model is viewed simply as a temporal pattern, whereas in most other approaches parameters of a mathematical model are estimated from data in which variables are measured separately.

Moreover, in APT probabilities of temporal patterns are estimated by relative frequency and duration.

References:

Frick, T. (1990). Analysis of Patterns in Time (APT): A Method of Recording and

Quantifying Temporal Relations in

Education. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 180-204.

Student Version:

The major difference between Analysis of

Patterns in Time and linear statistical models is that APT does not assume any specific mathematical model. Linear models attempt to find statistical relations between variables that have been measured separately. In APT, temporal patterns indicate relationships.

Those patterns are counted in order to estimate their likelihoods.

References:

Frick, T. (1990). Analysis of Patterns in Time (APT): A Method of Recording and

Quantifying Temporal Relations in

Education. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 180-204.

Paraphrasing plagiarism

This is not plagiarism

Word-for-Word plagiarism