In the case Lindsay P$.1$: Towne Properties Asset Management Co$.,$ Ltd$.,$ the court ruled that landlords

a$.$ do not have a duty to protect their tenants from third party criminal acts.

b$.$ have a duty to protect their tenants from third party criminal acts, whether foreseeable or not.

c$.$ have a duty to protect their tenants from third party criminal acts when the landlord should have reasonably foreseen the criminal activity and failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent it$.$

$$ d$.$ have a duty to protect their tenants from third party criminal acts, but only from other tenants.