In the course materials on the U$.$C$.$C$.,$ "warranties" were discussed. If Smith goes to a truck dealership and asks for a truck capable of handling a $6,000--$pound load, making it clear that the sales$-$person is to select the appropriate truck. Without saying anything about its load$-$carrying capacity, the sales$-$person selects a certain truck for Smith. Relying on the sales$-$person$$s choice, Smith buys the truck in question. This truck turns$-$out to be mechanically sound but is only capable of handling a $3,000-$pound load. Smith wants to sue the dealership because he didn$$t get the truck he desired. Based on our related class materials, which of the following gives Smith the best chance of recovery?

A lawsuit for breach of express warranty

A lawsuit for breach of the implied warranty of fitness $($for a particular purpose$)$

Based on our class materials, Palmer cannot recover and should not sue

Both a lawsuit for breach of express warranty and for breach of the implied warranty $($for a particular purpose$).$