In the Smith v$.$ Riley case referenced in the textbook, how of $($$$1\mathrm{.}00)$ and Appeals rule regarding whether a purchase for "the sun other good and valuable consideration" was sufficient consideratione agreement?

The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration, but only because a domestic partnership was involved.

The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration, but only because the sale of an interest in a lease was involved.

The Court ruled that the purchase amount was sufficient consideration.

The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration, but only because a sale of goods was involved.

The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration because over $$50,000$ was at issue.

Next $*$