In the Wright v$.$ Newman case, what does the court say that suggests that Newman's case would have been weaker if the promise involved something like the repair of a fence?

The Court says child support is less important than other obligations of a father.

The Court made it clear that it did not matter what kind of promise Wright may have made, so long as Newman relied on it$.$

The Court gives great weight to the moral obligation to support a child and to the obligations of fatherhood.