In these two citations, should the quote that is highlighted be quoted again in footnote 247 even if I'm just referring to "id" (the one before it?)

246. See, e.g., In re TriStar Pictures, Inc, 634 A.2d 319, 330 (Del. 1993) (\"A special injury is established where there is a wrong suffered by plainti' that was not suffered by all stockholders generally or where the wrong involves a contractual right of the stockholders, such as the right to vote\") (emphasis added). 247. Compare id. (\"A special injury is established where there is a wrong suffered by plaintiff that was not suffered by all stockholders generally or where the wrong involves a contractual right of the stockholders, such as the right to vote\") with Agosrino v. Hicks, 845 A.2d 1110, 1122 (Del. Ch. 2004) (\"[T]he inquiry should focus on whether an injury is suffered by the shareholder that is not dependent on a prior injury to the corporation")