Question: In this class discussion, let's examine two cases on anti-competitive behavior. 1. The first article is the media release by Competition and Consumer Commission of

In this class discussion, let's examine two cases on anti-competitive behavior.

1. The first article is the media release by Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) regarding the merger of Grab and Uber:

https://www.cccs.gov.sg/media-and-consultation/newsroom/media-releases/grab-uber-id-24-sept-18

  • Does the ride hailing app market meet the assumptions of Monopoly?
  • What were the reasons for CCCS' ruling that the merger harmed competition?

2. The second is regarding China's investigation against Alibaba:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/business/china-alibaba-ant-group-monopoly-probe-502881

  • Why is perfect competition more efficient than monopoly?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Economics Questions!