in this context In Case Study 1, Cindy's son potentially breached legal requirements by misusing the Enduring Power of Attorney to manage her finances without her informed consent. In Case Study 2, Mary breached legal requirements by administering medication without authorization, which is outside her scope of practice. In Case Study 1, the ethical issue of financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult by a family member. In Case Study 3, Morgan's neglect of Lena's care plan and her disrespectful attitude towards Lena. In Case Study 2, the dilemma of whether to report Mary's unauthorized medication administration, balancing the need to maintain professional standards with the potential impact on a colleague. In Case Study 3, the dilemma of whether to report Morgan's behavior, balancing the duty to protect Lena's well-being with the potential consequences for Morgan. In Case Study 1, Cindy's son managing her finances could lead to a conflict of interest if he prioritizes his own financial gain over her best interests. In Case Study 1, the actual conflict of interest arises when Cindy's son uses his legal authority to sell her house, potentially prioritizing his interests over hers