In voting to allow DNA profiling for all arrested persons on federal crimes, the Supreme Court narrowly approved it with a 5 to 4-vote. During the discussion, dissenting voter Justice Antonin Scalia discarded an argument about the impressive number of cases DNA testing helped the states solve. He responded by explaining that unreasonable searches and seizures would also help solve cases and that the fourth amendment sometimes stands in the way of crime solving. What arguments can be raised to both refute and support Justice Scalia's claims that collecting and storing DNA from arrestees violate the person's fourth amendment unreasonable search and seizure protection