In what situation would justification be appropriate?

$1$Justification is appropriate for either type of wrongful interference tort.

$2$Justification is appropriate only for wrongful $($tortious$)$ interference with business relationship or prospective advantage.

$3$A plaintiff can use justification for either type of wrongful interference tort.

$4$Justification is only appropriate for wrongful $($tortious$)$ interference with a contract or a contractual relationship.