influence is wrong answer

compliance is wrong answer. please explain your answers

importe LUI LO Naviyale ulydilational punues, iluseu appropriately. The goal of this activity is to demonstrate your understanding of power, influence, and politics by reading a case and answering questions that follow. Read the following case about politics at work and answer the questions that follow. Google only wants "civil behavior at work. Talk about work at work, talk about politics elsewhere. The multinational technology company announced to its over 100.000 employees in August 2019 that nonwork topics were causing disruption. Specifically, political arguments have taken a large role in the company's online forums. This is an interesting turn of events, given that the company has long been an example of a relaxed and creative culture, In the prior months, the company was accused of suppressing conservative political views in searches. A leaked video after the 2016 presidential election showed the displeasure of the Google executives with the election results. Over the next months, the online internal platforms for employee discussion became increasingly argumentative and in some cases, worse. Organizational politics are of course, not the same as government politics. But this situation at Google could easily lead to organizational political behavior. Any strong expression of opinions by executives exerts influence on employees. At Google, the video of executives expressing negative opinions about the election immediately takes advantage of their power to influence subordinates. Those who are not of the same political opinions as the executives are now excluded from a circle of those who do agree. This can easily lead to those people either receding from involvement and hiding their views or taking an aggressive stance that further causes work problems. Excluding employees can often be unintended. But when you are pushed out of the important discussions and decisions. especially by superiors, you are then on the "outs." This can lead to low performance and commitment and even leaving the organization in more serious cases, Political behavior on the part of those who are in agreement with executives can then bond further, whether intentionally or not. Based on this, Google's direction with their new policies about topics allowed in internal communication are, therefore, not as shocking as they might appear. The degree of influence is high for the Google executives for many reasons, but perhaps most because they are able to make any decisions without regard for the company's existing rules, called Multiple Choice Influence discretion visibility resource availability participation An employee expresses her similar political views to a Google executive at a work get-together and compliments the executive on his excellent articulation of the issues, perhaps the best she has ever heard. She is engaging in an influence behavior that is Multiple Choice apprising, moderately effective O consultation, most effective Ingratiation, moderately effective pressure, leest effective exchange: least effective B. People who share opinions with executives may try to use that to enter into more social circles and meet powerful people who also agree, expressing what type of political skill? of 5 Multiple Choice oped coercion DOK O networking ability int 3 ences reward power .O apparent sincerity Interpersonal astuteness A person who hears the executives strong opinions may be willing to adopt the same opinions, but with mixed feelings, a reaction to influence called Multiple Choice compliance O apparent sincerity, apprising centrality discretion. Your boss asks you to attend a meeting to participate in a serious discussion of corporate policies that you disagree with. After the meeting, you are convinced and agree completely with the policies, showing you experienced what reaction to the meeting's influence? Multiple Choice discretion internalization compliance O resistance apprising