Initially, the plaintiff company took issue with the defendant company's logo. In a subsequent case, the plaintiffs opposed the defendant's arrangement to sell their products with a particular vendor, claiming that this arrangement breached a prior agreement in which the sale of certain goods to franchised stores was to be restricted.

Which one match?

1) Bateman V Steed

2) Honda Canada Inc V Keays

3)chartier v MNP ltd

4) Rivermist Holding ltd V McGregor Estate

5)Mars Canada v M&M Meat shop

6) Tim Ludwig V BDO Canada

7) Meiorin Case

8)Evan V Teamster local union 31

9) Black V Moison Canada

10) Dunn Estate V Dunn

11) Paramount life insurance V Hill

12) Behiet V Primco Limited

13) Mresch V Canadian Tire Corp

14) Mitchell Jenner & Associates V Saunders

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Answer Based on the details provided in the description the case that best matc... View the full answer