INSTRUCTIONS (1) Read the case (2) Provide a paragraph with more than five sentences (ie, in the section for "Purport") that interprets the theme of the case, based on concepts learned in Chapters [1]. 2, 5, 7, or 8). (3) In at least three sentences, answer the questions. (Make sure you justify your answers with learned 1.1.Professor Lucas Phelps sent the following e-mail to Professor Marlin Jones: "I recently read the opinion piece you wrote for the Sacramento Bee on affirmative action. Your opinion is incorrect, your reasoning and analysis are poor, and I am embarrassed that you are a member of the faculty here at Cal State Yolinda." Professor Jones forwarded the note from Professor Phelps to the provost of the university and asked that Professor Phelps be disciplined for using the university e-mail system for harassment purposes. Professor Phelps objected when the provost contacted him: "He had no right to forward that e-mail to you. That was private correspondence. And you have no right of access to my e-mail. I have privacy rights 1.2. Purport: Interpretation (Times Romans Font-10-Points; single space) I 1.1. Question 1: Was there a breach of the "privacy right of Professor Phelp's. 1.2. Questions 2: Which law makes provision to protect the "right of privacy of individuals? concepts of law.1.1. 1.3.Questions 3: What is the night of privacy," as prescribed by legal provisions?