INSTRUCTIONS AND CASE SCENARIO Legal Memorandum Your assignment is to write 2-3 Pg Double space -page...

 

Transcribed Image Text:

INSTRUCTIONS AND CASE SCENARIO Legal Memorandum Your assignment is to write 2-3 Pg Double space -page legal memo analyzing the fact pattern below. You are to discuss the parties and relevant issues in a thorough analysis. These issues deal with tort and Constitutional law. This is not an exercise in memory. Lawyers refer to resources all the time when they are researching their legal problem I am not interested in your outcome (who will end up winning in court) as I am in how you use the law to support your conclusion. Base your answer only on the facts given. Please analyze and address the questions (Two parts) regarding the following case scenario: The police did not arrest the protestors but did require them to stop marching and move away from HealthyMart. Assignment Part II: A. The protestors want to sue the City for violation of their constitutional rights. Specifically, what legal claim could the protestors sue for and why? B. Could the protestors be convicted of trespassing against Healthy Mart? Why or why not? Case Scenario: HealthyMart, Inc., a large retail super market store that sells a variety of products, has had an eventful couple of weeks. Part II. On Friday, a small group of political protestors carrying signs and quietly chanting were marching back and forth the full length of the public sidewalk in front of HealthyMart. HealthyMart encompasses the entire block by the public sidewalk with entry and exit doors located directly in the center of the store building, and with privately owned parking in the back of the store. Sometimes the protestors were at either of the two ends of the sidewalk in front of HealthyMart, and thus, not directly in front of the entry/exit door doors to HealthyMart. The protestors did not walk on or enter the private parking lot owned by HealthyMart; the protestors did not stop and congregate in front of the store or its entry/exit doors at any time. The management of HealthyMart believed that the protestors were impeding the ingress and egress of customers into HealthyMart end therefore interfering with business. HealthyMart called the police to have the protestors removed. End of document INSTRUCTIONS AND CASE SCENARIO Legal Memorandum Your assignment is to write 2-3 Pg Double space -page legal memo analyzing the fact pattern below. You are to discuss the parties and relevant issues in a thorough analysis. These issues deal with tort and Constitutional law. This is not an exercise in memory. Lawyers refer to resources all the time when they are researching their legal problem I am not interested in your outcome (who will end up winning in court) as I am in how you use the law to support your conclusion. Base your answer only on the facts given. Please analyze and address the questions (Two parts) regarding the following case scenario: The police did not arrest the protestors but did require them to stop marching and move away from HealthyMart. Assignment Part II: A. The protestors want to sue the City for violation of their constitutional rights. Specifically, what legal claim could the protestors sue for and why? B. Could the protestors be convicted of trespassing against Healthy Mart? Why or why not? Case Scenario: HealthyMart, Inc., a large retail super market store that sells a variety of products, has had an eventful couple of weeks. Part II. On Friday, a small group of political protestors carrying signs and quietly chanting were marching back and forth the full length of the public sidewalk in front of HealthyMart. HealthyMart encompasses the entire block by the public sidewalk with entry and exit doors located directly in the center of the store building, and with privately owned parking in the back of the store. Sometimes the protestors were at either of the two ends of the sidewalk in front of HealthyMart, and thus, not directly in front of the entry/exit door doors to HealthyMart. The protestors did not walk on or enter the private parking lot owned by HealthyMart; the protestors did not stop and congregate in front of the store or its entry/exit doors at any time. The management of HealthyMart believed that the protestors were impeding the ingress and egress of customers into HealthyMart end therefore interfering with business. HealthyMart called the police to have the protestors removed. End of document