Instructions Answer the following case problems using the IRAC method, unless the question states that the IRAC method is not required. An explanation of the IRAC method is available here. Submit your well-written answers in a Microsoft Word or PDF document via the dropbox. The IRAC Method - Issue - Identify and state the legal issue presented by the fact scenario. (1-2 sentences) - Rule - State/define the legal principle that applies to the issue. - Analysis - Discuss how the legal principle relates to the fact scenario. This should be the most lengthy portion of your answer. - Conclusion - State your conclusion based on your analysis. (1-2 sentences) Yates contracted with Waterworks, Inc. to have an above ground pool installed in his backyard. Waterworks specialized in the sale and construction of pools. The two parties entered into a contract that called for Waterworks to "furnish all labor and materials to construct a Wavecrest brand pool, and furnish and install pool with vinyl liners." The total cost for materials and labor was $3,690. There was no breakdown of costs between labor and materials. After the pool was installed, its sides began bowing out, the 24 wooden supports became rotted and misaligned, tilting the pool. Yates brought suit alleging that Waterworks had violated several provisions of Article 2 of the UCC. a) Using the IRAC method, discuss whether the transaction was one involving "goods" making it subject to Article 2 of the UCC. b) If we assume that Article 2 applies, under what warranty theory (or theories) might a lawsuit be brought (IRAC not required)