Instructions For this assignment, I am asking you to submit a rough draft of your second paper. Given that it is a first draft, it's fine for the paper to be, well, rough--i.e., not carefully edited and proofread--but I do expect it to meet the minimum page requirement for this paper (four FULL pages) at the very least. I want additions or explanations to this essay, and to add more quotes and arrange it according to the: TOPIC EXPOSITION BODY PARAGRAPH 1 BODY PARAGRAPH 2 BODY PARAGRAPH 3 BODY PARAGRAPH 4 CONCLUSION

The essay:

Gloria Anzalda's essay "Speaking in Tongues: A Letter to Third World Women Writers" stands out as a compelling exploration of language and identity.

In this piece, Anzalda addresses the complexities marginalized women writers face, particularly those navigating multiple languages and cultural identities. Her focus on the struggles of Third World women resonates deeply, making her arguments memorable and profoundly relatable. This essay analyzes the rhetorical choices Anzalda employs to engage her audience and convey her purpose effectively.

The intended audience for Anzalda's essay is primarily Third World women writers, but it also extends to academic readers interested in feminist and postcolonial discourse. Anzalda's choice to focus on this specific group influences her presentation and structure, as she uses an empowering and inclusive voice. By addressing her readers directly, she creates a sense of solidarity among women who share similar experiences. This targeted approach invites readers to connect personally with her arguments, making the essay more impactful.

Anzalda's purpose in writing this essay is to validate the experiences of Third World women writers and to encourage them to embrace their unique voices. She seeks to foster community among these women while urging them to reject dominant narratives that marginalize their stories. Through her writing, Anzalda aims to empower her audience, encouraging them to navigate the complexities of language and identity confidently.

One of the central claims in Anzalda's essay is that language is a powerful tool for identity and empowerment. She supports this claim with several sub-claims, including embracing multilingualism and the personal struggles associated with linguistic diversity. The structure of the essay reflects her narrative style, interweaving personal anecdotes with broader social commentary. This approach allows her to connect her experiences with her audience, creating a shared understanding of their challenges. Anzalda establishes her credibility or ethos by drawing from her experiences as a bilingual writer. She shares her struggles with language, which lends authenticity to her arguments and reinforces her authority on the subject. This personal connection enhances her credibility and makes her message more relatable to her audience. By revealing her vulnerabilities, Anzalda invites readers to engage with her narrative on a deeper level.

The emotional appeal, or pathos, in Anzalda's essay, is evident in her depiction of the struggles faced by marginalized women writers. She evokes feelings of frustration and determination, particularly in her exploration of the challenges related to linguistic identity. Anzalda's use of vivid imagery and personal anecdotes elicits empathy from her readers, drawing them into her narrative and reinforcing the emotional weight of her message. This emotional resonance is crucial in inspiring her audience to embrace their own voices.

Logos, or logical reasoning, is also a significant element of Anzalda's argument. She employs logical connections between the personal and the political, arguing that embracing one's linguistic heritage can lead to empowerment. By presenting a coherent and well-structured argument, Anzalda strengthens her thesis and credibility. The underlying logic of her essay

emphasizes the importance of language as a vehicle for expressing identity and fostering connection among women writers. One notable rhetorical strategy Anzalda employs is the use of personal narrative. By sharing her own experiences, she creates a sense of intimacy with her audience. This strategy illustrates her points about language and fosters a connection that encourages readers to reflect on their own experiences. Additionally, Anzalda's use of code-switching throughout the essay emphasizes the fluidity of identity, further reinforcing her argument about the significance of linguistic diversity.

In conclusion, Gloria Anzalda's "Speaking in Tongues: A Letter to Third World Women Writers" effectively engages its intended audience through rhetorical strategies and appeals. By directly addressing Third World women writers, she fosters solidarity and empowerment. Anzalda's use of personal narrative, emotional resonance, and logical reasoning creates a compelling argument for embracing linguistic diversity. Through her rhetorical choices, she validates marginalized women's experiences and inspires them to reclaim their voices in the literary world. This analysis highlights the effectiveness of Anzalda's approach, illustrating how her choices resonate with her audience and support her overarching purpose.

Key references:

Anzalda, Gloria. "Speaking in Tongues: A Letter to Third World Women Writers."This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, edited by Cherre Moraga and Gloria Anzalda, Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press, 1981, pp. 165-173.