INSTRUCTIONS: I need help formatting this into an APA 7 format that is Between 7.5.0. And 1.0.0.0 w.o.rd.s.

Here is the Rubric and assignment instructions:

Assessment Description Write an essay of 750-1 ,000 words regarding the following: 1. Describe some ofthe responsibilities of the correction system to care for inmates? 2. Explain how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system. 3. What principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintaining the public interest? Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites, or those provided in Class Resources. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. You are required to submit this assignmentto LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in CIIiSS Resources lfyou need assistance. Benchmark information This assignment assesses the following programmatic competency: BS justice Studies 3.4- Implement principles of organizational psychology in a justice administration environment. 6') Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc, Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc, for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc, appropriate to assignment and discipline 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate No conclusion is offered. 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. audience. 3.58 points Writing lacks logical progression ofthe thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose. 2.86 points Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect. 2.86 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1.43 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. 4.13 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. 3.3 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. 3.3 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 1.65 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. demonstrated. 4.68 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 3.74 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. 3.74 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 1.87 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. specific audience. 5.5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unied. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 4.4 points Specic and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered. 4.4 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 2.2 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. 66 Research Utilize the GCU Library to locate at least three relevant, scholarly sources in support of the content, Thesis, Position, or Purpose Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience, Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc, 0 points No outside sources are cited. 0 points The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. 0 points No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate No conclusion is offered. 0 points Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. 10.73 points Some sources may be cited but they are not scholarly and/or relevant. 3.58 points The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience. 3.58 points Writing lacks logical progression ofthe thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose. 2.86 points Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect. 2.86 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 12.38 points At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a loosely connected, vague way. 4.13 points The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasnonally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. 4.13 points Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. 3.3 points Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. 3.3 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 14.03 points At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a welleconnected way and elaborated on. 4.68 points The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. 4.68 points The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 3.74 points Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. 3.74 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 1 6.5 points At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited and are flawlessly integrated into the essay to support the claims made therein. 5.5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. 5.5 points The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unied. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. 4.4 points Specic and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered. 4.4 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. Rubric Criteria Criterion Correction System Responsibilities Description of some of the responsibilities of the correction system to ca re for inmates. Morality And Ethics Explanation of how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system, Organization Psychology (B) What principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintaining the public interest? (C34) Research Utilize the GCU Library to locate at least three relevant, scholarly sources in support 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Essay does not describe some of the responsibilities of the correction system to care for inmates. 0 points Essay does not explain how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system. 0 points Essay does not discuss how principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintainingthe public interest. 0 points No outside sources are cited 2. Insufficient 14.3 points Essay attempts to describe some of the responsibilities of the correction system to care for inmates but the description is inadequate; description is weak and missing evidence. 14.3 points Essay attempts to explain how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system but the description is inadequate; explanation is weak and missing evidence. 17.88 points Essay attempts to discuss how principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintaining the public interest but the description is inadequate; explanation is weak and missing evidence. 10.73 points Some sources may be cited but they are not scholarly 3. Approaching 16.5 points The description of some of the responsibilities of the correction system to care for inmates is present and adequate; description is limited and lacks some evidence. 16.5 points Explanation of how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system is present and adequate; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence. 20.63 points Discussion of how principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintaining the public interest is present and adequate; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence. 12.38 points At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in mom 4. Acceptable 18.7 points The description of some of the responsibilities ofthe correction system to care for inmates is clear, coherent and relevant; the description is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence. 18.7 points Explanation of how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system is clear, coherent and relevant; explanation is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence. 23.38 points Discussion of how principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintaining the public interest is clear, coherent and relevant; explanation is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence. 14.03 points At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a welleconnected way and Total 110 points 5. Ta rget 22 points The description of some of the responsibilities of the correction system to care for inmates system is expertly written; description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence. 22 points Explanation of how morality and ethics affects how care is provided to inmates in the correction system is expertly written; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence. 27.5 points Discussion of how principles of organization psychology could be implemented into the corrections system to better support employees' ethical standards while still maintaining the public interest is expertly written; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence. 16.5 points At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited and are flawlessly integrated