Instructions: Read the case study below the a she s that follow In 1996 chanon and Egypt had signed a bilateral try for promoting investments of both citizens in both countries, article 6 of that really prohibits any measures on m y transfer for the Lebanese citizens in Eppland Vice Sami, an Egyptian citizen having investments in Ichen deposited 3 million SUS Bank Med. Sada branch matures on 1/1/2020. Since 17/10/2019 chanen have witnessed some restrictions for withdrawals and transfers from banks due to comic and financial crisis. On 15/11/2019 Bank Med branch manager of Saida called Sami offering him to postpone the maturity date of the deposit for the more years and raised the interest male from 10 to 15%, halfpadin SUS and halfpadin Lehnese pounds Sami refused and insisted on 20% incest, all paid in SUS and gave the bank one week to reply, after that there was no communication between both until 1/1/2020 when Sami ordered the bank to transfer the amount of deposit to his bank account in Egypt. Bank Med refused due to decree issued by the counsel of ministries restricting transfers in SUS if there was no urgent case. Also Bank Med informed Sami that they have postponed the maturity date and accepted to give Sami the 20% interest rate in SUS Sami refused to postpone the maturity date and decided to sue the bank and claim for the deposit transfer Question number one: (25 marks) Determine if the bank can refuse to transfer the deposit depending on the decree issued from Council of Ministers Question number twe(25 marks) The consent can be reached in two different ways Classify the role of the phone call between the branch manager and Sami with regard to the consent formation Question number three (25 marks) Specify if there is any contract concluded between the hand Sami concerning postponement of the maturity date Question number for (25 marks) Sami's lawyer decided to see the bank within the chamber of first instance court in Saida Justify if his choice was right