Instructions
You should write a flowing prose paper (NOT 1, 2, 3 etc..). Your paper should have headings (Using APA 7thedition format style) that reflect each of the sections below (i.e. Introduction, opening statements,Establishing/Challenging aPrima FacieCase for Murder,evidence, closing arguments, outside factors, concluding thoughts). Under each heading you will address each of the questions asked in flowing prose (NOT 1, 2, 3, etc..). Aaron Hernandezwas a professional athlete, having played for the New England Patriots. In 2013, he was accused of murdering a mutual friend, Odin Lloyd. In 2015, he was convicted of the Lloyd murder. You may conduct your own research in answering the questions below, but also consider the following two links for support: Aaron Hernandez Aaron Hernandez Part 2 After reviewing the information provided, submit a paper using the format below and answering the following questions supported by specific authority from the links provided. A. Introduction Give a brief overview of the facts of the case, including an explanation of the specific statute(s) under which the defendant was charged and/or convicted and the ultimate outcome of the case Give a brief explanation of the burden of proof, which is proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal prosecution. Give a brief explanation of why theHernandeztrial was so important to the prosecution of crimes in the United States. B. Opening Statements Which attorney was most persuasive and why? Which attorney gave the jury more significant facts to consider and what were those facts? C. Establishing/Challenging aPrima FacieCase for Murder Name one key witness who helped establish aprima faciecase of homicide for the prosecution or challenged aprima faciecase for the defense, and explain why he or she helped or hurt the prosecution of the case D. Evidence What other evidence (other than testimony) was significant in establishing or challenging aprima faciecase of murder? Why was this significant? E. Closing Arguments Describe why one argument was more persuasive than the other. Discuss what in particular may have persuaded the jury one way or the other based on the closing argument. F. Outside Factors What, if any, outside factors (media, public opinion, etc.) affected the trial and/or the outcome of the case and how did they do so? (What book?) G. Concluding thoughts Discuss why this case is important to the study of criminal justice and criminal prosecution, and how reading primary documentation about it has changed your own perspective on the case.