Question: Interpret the following: I never attacked a problem by constructing a Hypothesis. I never deduced Theorems of submitted them to Experimental Check (p. 112). Does
Interpret the following: "I never attacked a problem by constructing a Hypothesis. I never deduced Theorems of submitted them to Experimental Check" (p. 112). Does this mean that science can progress without hypotheses or theorems? Can science be purely inductive? Why or why not
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
