Introduction This is an open book assignment. You may use all textbooks and materials approved by your instructor. On the internet, go to www. Canlil.org then answer all 7 of the questions below based on the cases you will find on that site. Look up the case of Vorvis v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1085 1. What level of court heard the Vorvis case? (0.5 mark) 2. Why is the level of court that heard this case important? (1.5 marks) 3. Justice Mcintyre delivered the opinion of the majority of the court in the Vorvis case. What did she say was the only basis for a court awarding punitive damages? (5marks) 4. In deciding Vorvis, did Mcintyre, discusses the previous ruling in Robitaille v. Vancouver Hockey Club Lid. (1981), 124 D.L.R. (3d) 228 (B.C.C.A.). Did the court follow the Robitaille decision when deciding Vorvis? (1.5 marks) 5. Were punitive damages awarded in the Robitaille case? Why or why not? (5marks) Page | 2 LAW3014 CD college Assignment 2 (10%) Due: Session 9 Law of Torts 6. Did the case of Schulz v. Beacon Roofing Supply Canada Company, 2016 BCSC 1475 follow Vorvis? (1.5 marks) 7. In the Schulz case, were punitive damages awarded? Why or why not? (5marks)