Introduction (Your full intro, revised based on the feedback from the Week 3 Discussion Board " Introduction 1:

In an era where technological advancements have revolutionized nearly every aspect of human life, the education sector remains a critical area of focus. The integration of technology in classrooms has sparked a heated debate among educators, parents, and policymakers. Proponents argue that digital tools enhance learning experiences and prepare students for a tech-driven future, while opponents raise concerns about screen time and the potential for distraction. Despite these differing viewpoints, it is essential to recognize that the judicious use of technology in education can significantly improve student engagement and learning outcomes. By leveraging digital resources, educators can create more interactive and personalized learning environments that cater to the diverse needs of students.

Introduction 2:

The rapid proliferation of digital technology has transformed industries worldwide, yet its impact on education remains a contentious issue. As schools increasingly adopt digital tools, the debate over their efficacy intensifies. Advocates highlight the potential for technology to democratize education, providing access to a wealth of information and innovative teaching methods. Critics, however, caution against the overreliance on gadgets, citing concerns about the erosion of traditional learning skills and the digital divide. Nevertheless, the strategic implementation of technology in educational settings holds the promise of enhancing student engagement and academic performance. By thoughtfully integrating digital tools, educators can foster a more dynamic and inclusive learning environment that addresses the varied learning styles of students.

Commentary:

Upon reviewing both introductions, the second introduction appears to be the more compelling choice. It effectively captures the essence of the debate surrounding technology in education while emphasizing the potential benefits and addressing the concerns. The language used is more dynamic and engaging, which can draw readers into the discussion. Additionally, the second introduction provides a broader context by mentioning the digital divide, which adds depth to the argument. This approach sets a strong foundation for the essay, making it more likely to resonate with a diverse audience".)

1. Opening sentence or hook
2. Explanatory sentence about topic/problem
3. Thesis statement

II. Supporting Claim 1

1. Topic Sentence: What is the first claim that supports your argument?
2. Source #1: What evidence have you found that supports your claim?
3. Explain how this evidence supports your claim. Include some APA in-text citations, i.e. (Ford, 2020, p. 1).

Transitional Phrase: ___________________

III. Supporting Claim 2

1. Topic Sentence: What is the second claim that supports your argument?
2. Source #2: What evidence have you found that supports your claim?
3. Explain how this evidence supports your claim. Include some APA in-text citations, i.e. (CDC, 2020, p. 25).

Transitional Phrase: ___________________

IV. Supporting Claim 3

1. Topic Sentence: What is the third claim that supports your argument?
2. Source #3: What evidence have you found that supports your claim?
3. Explain how this evidence supports your claim. Include some APA in-text citations, i.e. (Rousseau et al., 2020, para. 29).

V. Conclusion

1. 1. Note the most important claim you are making
   2. Reiterate your thesis statement. (Be sure to state your thesis statement differently than you did in the introduction paragraph.)
   3. Reflective sentence or call to action

VI. References (at least three. Your final paper needs at least four, with at least three coming from the university library databases.)

VII. Opposing Viewpoints

1. Good arguments must consider an alternate point of view. You can do this in a separate paragraph or within one of your supporting paragraphs.
2. What alternate point of view are you presenting? Identify a source that presents this objection and cite it, i.e. (Smith & Ruiz, 2019, para. 3).
3. How do you respond to or rebut the counterargument described above? You may use a source to refute this opposing point as well.

Your outline should include the following elements:

• A fully written introduction (revised from the Week 3 Discussion)
• A thesis that ends your introduction (revised from Week 2's assignment and the Week 3 Discussion)
• Three sections, each with its own topic sentence, research, and brief explanation
• At least one reasonable objection and how you plan to overcome it.
  • Click here for a guide to working with counterpoints.
• Quotations and citations from three academic journal sources from Keiser's Library (from Week 2);
  • Remember, your final paper requires the use of a total of four sources.
  • Contact your instructor if you have questions regarding the fourth or any additional sources.
• Transitional phrases are required.
  • Click here for a YouTube video discussion of transitional phrases.
  • Or, click here for a Purdue OWL discussion of transitional phrases.
• Comments to be included in your conclusion
• Minimum of three APA formatted references in your reference list.

REQUIREMENTS

• Follow the outline format provided.
• Include APA formatted citations (Last name, YEAR, p. ___ or para. ___).
• Include APA formatted references in a clear reference list.
• Submit your outline in the assignment area by Sunday, 11:59 PM EST.