Is it morally permissible to censor or block public access to websites dedicated to the propagation of hate speech? Provide an argument to defend your answer. Computer programs are considered intellectual property and are now subject to both copyright and patent law. In what ways is this controversial? What does it mean to say that modern society is becoming a sort of panopticon? Assuming this is at least somewhat true, is it morally problematic? Explain your answer. The possibility of using strong encryption on one's data seems to present a conflict between our rights of privacy and property on the one hand and issues of national security and police investigations on the other hand. Should such encryption be publicly available? Is "hactivism" a morally justifiable form of civil disobedience? Defend your answer. Should computer science professionalize, so that one would "practice" computer science the way one "practices" law or medicine, with specific requirements, privileges, and obligations