is this answer wrong? 2. In narrative form, discuss the results of both analyses; Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis. We put the Mann-Whitney U test to the test to compare the disruption of life patterns and social relationships between males and females. The results of this test for disruption of life patterns revealed a U value of 5650.500, a Z score of -1.810, and a p-value of .070. This p-value suggests that there is no notable statistical difference between males and females regarding disruption of life patterns, as it exceeds the conventional threshold of .05. Similarly, the Mann-Whitney U test for disruption of social relationships resulted in a U value of 6302.000, a Z score of -.493, and a p-value of .622. Again, the p-value is much higher than .05, indicating an absence of significant statistical differences between the two groups concerning the disruption of social relationships. The Kruskal-Wallis test was also employed to assess whether there were any significant differences in disruption of life patterns and disruption of social relationships between males and females. The Kruskal-Wallis test for disruption of life patterns yielded an H value of 3.278 with a p-value of .070, while the test for disruption of social relationships produced an H value of .243 with a p-value of .622. Both tests indicated that there were no notable differences between males and females in these two areas, as the p-values were greater than .05. In summary, both the Mann-Whitney U and Kr