is this correct

This question has 2 parts. 0/1 point earned One consequence of global climate change is an increase in frequency and severity of wildfires as some areas simultaneously heat up and experience drought. Part 1 Consider your knowledge about the carbon cycle and primary productivity. Then, use the drop-down menus to complete the following sentences about the likely ecological consequences of wildfires. + The impact of fire on primary producers is likely to | be variable - many primary producers will decrease in population size, but not necessarily all. vi. * Fires are not universally bad for ecosystems. For example, some tree seeds will not germinate unless they have been exposed to fire. An increase in frequency of fires is likely to | increase \\ | population size and | increase \\V | biomass of these tree species. * Fires are likely to | decrease primary producer biomass in the short term. In the long term, fires may | increase \\ biodiversity. Part 2 In some settings, fire can break down up to 80% of the above-ground primary producer biomass. This can return limiting nutrients to the soil, open up new previously-unavailable space, and change microclimates in the habitat. Based on this information, how would fires likely impact species in local communities? Fires will likely have a variable impact that benefits some species and is detrimental to others. O Fires will likely have a positive impact because populations sizes of all species in the community will increase. Itis impossible to predict the impact of fires on specific species because the impacts are primarily random. O Fires will likely have a negative impact because populations sizes of all species in the community will decrease