It]. Casts per case increased in 34.20:} I'rarn a budgeted value at" $43543. This increased actual tetal casts by what ameunt'.' Use fhf'it'fg data m cttt'c'ttt'ctte the wartime-es in payments I f .."_i_ The l'ellawing infamtatiett has been prepared Her e heme health agency: Hedger dent-rt! Wage ltate per lteur $l EJJEI ii I i' Fixed Heurs 32!] 321] 1|.I'at'ialzile Hnurs per lteletiee 1|inlalue Unit {R'e'llj Li] H Relative 1\"turttlue Units {Rh-\"U s} LEIIII L201] Tetal Laber Ilears 1.320 Lean Lab-er Casts $2 I . E20 $22.33 Cast eer Ft'il'U 52 I -1 2 5225.23 Budgeted costs at actual trelume a'auld be $21344 [$2l .I2 K |.2.E|I]]. and the Intel variance te he explained is 32.5 313 Unt'atrtmahlt: {$2 2.330- 325.344}. Be .srtne tel .speet's "thett'rer the mrianee Ils- _.i'"tt'l'rra'tl!'e m' utmerrtbfe. I I. What is the amaunt al'sarianee that is attributed ta the differenee between the budgeted and actual wage rate per hear? l2. What is the Element of 1variance that is attributed ta the change in laber pruductivlty