It is important to note, as you have, that when deploying these tools that could infringe on citizens' privacy, they should be accurate and reliable. It would be a tragedy to penalize and criminalize individuals only for the tech to be faulty and inaccurate. The limitations of thermal imaging technology highlight the need for careful consideration in deploying such surveillance tools, proving the importance of protecting civil liberties against technological advances that may infringe on privacy. Thankfully, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over cases like this since they involve constitutional rights (J.D., B. W., 2019, p. 167). If the constitutionality of law enforcement actions were left up to state courts, there could be a mix of case law from state to state. Given the differences in the jurisdiction and the potential for varying interpretations of similar privacy concerns, how would your state's courts handle similar issues