Jack bought a used Ford F-150 from Chad for $19,000. The truck had 68,000 miles on it. Chad told jack that the truck needed a new headlight lamp. but that nothing else was wrong with the truck. He promised that the truck was in great condition. Two days after the sale, Jack discovered a problem with the clutch. The clutch worsened and the next week Jack paid $1,800 to have the clutch fixed. Two weeks later, the brakes failed on the truck. Jack sued Chad for breach of his express warranty.

Start a thread that contains answers to the following questions. Your responses should incorporate topics and explain the relevant law.

What arguments would support Jack’s case?

What arguments would support Chad's claim that never gave an express warranty?

Who would win? Explain.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The arguments that would support Jacks case include First Chad never gave Jack an express warranty There was no promise that the truck would run smoothly and nothing in the advertising of the truck su... View the full answer