John is suing Mary for breach of a contract pursuant to which John would pay Mary $10,000 in exchange for Mary renovating a bathroom in John's house.  John is on the witness stand, and his attorney is going through the provisions of the contract that John and Mary signed.  One line in the contract specifies that Mary will install tile flooring in the bathroom.  John asserts that he and Mary discussed the tile for the bathroom and they agreed that the flooring tile would also be applied to the walls from floor level to a height of 4.5 ft.

You represent Mary, and you want to object to this testimony.  What is the best objection you could make here?

 

Group of answer choices

A. John is not an expert witness

B. John's testimony violates the parol evidence rule.

C. John's evidence is prejudicial.

D. John's testimony is hearsay

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The detailed answer for the above question is provided ... View the full answer