Johnson works for Security Agents, Inc. as a security guard at a building in New York City. The building is owned by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, a sovereign wealth fund owned by the government of Abu Dhabi. During the renovation of the building, Johnson slips on something spilled on the floor of the building, falls, and gets injured. He contends that he suffered permanent injuries in the fall and sues the Abu Dhabi government in tort for his injuries. The district court dismisses the suit, holding that the government is immune because of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976. Johnson appeals. Does the act bar Johnson's suit? a. Yes, because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act states that a sovereign nation should never be subject to litigation in a foreign court. b. Yes, because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act protects countries and their officials in international business transactions. c. No, because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act states that countries are not immune from the jurisdiction of foreign courts based on their commercial activities. d. No, because the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act applies to U.S. companies and their agents from bribing foreign officials, not to commercial activities involving foreign nations