Kate, a real estate developer, signs a contract to purchase a lake front property from Logan at $$10,500,000$ for $120$ acres more or less. If she discovers one week before closing that the lot is actually only $85$ acres, would she most likely be able to rescind the contract?

Question $3$ options:

a$)$ yes, because even though this transaction appears to be "sale in gross" the deficiency of almost $30\%$ would be found too excessive by most courts.

b$)$ no$,$ because this transaction appears to be "sale$-$in$-$gross" and $30\%$ deficiency would not be found sufficient to rescind the contract by most courts.

c$)$ no$,$ because classifying this transaction as "sale$-$in$-$gross" as opposed to "sale per acre" has no bearing on the result.