Question: Knapsack Example: Public Key (General Knapsack): 82, 123, 287, 83, 248, 373, 10, 471 Alice's Cipher: 10010110 or 82+83+373+10 = 548 Private Key (Superincreasing Knapsack):
Knapsack Example:
Public Key (General Knapsack): 82, 123, 287, 83, 248, 373, 10, 471
Alice's Cipher: 10010110 or 82+83+373+10 = 548
Private Key (Superincreasing Knapsack): 2, 3, 7, 14, 30, 57, 120, 251 and Bob has 41^-1mod491 --> 12 to decrypt the message.
For the knapsack example given in the text, the ciphertext was not reduced modulo n.
- Show that for the specific example given in this chapter, the knapsack also works if the ciphertext is reduced modulo n.
- Show that this is always the case, that is, show that it makes no difference to the recipient whether the ciphertext was reduced modulo n or not.
- Is either case (reducing the ciphertext modulo n or not) preferable from Trudys perspective?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
