Learners will read the case summary Bogenberger v$.$ Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Inc. on page $139-140(138).$ After reading the case, learners will submit a $3$ paragraph response detailing the following: Whether they agree with the court$$s finding the Pi Kappa Alpha may be negligent in the hazing death of David Bogenberger. Whether they believe that the outcome would have been different if the fraternity members had recruited sorority women to participate in the hazing by filling the pledges$$ cups with vodka and directing them to drink. Respond to the $$What if the Facts were Different$$ question at the end of the case summary $-$ The Duyal Care and its reach Bucanther The $1$ The Case $5\mathrm{.}2$ Hogenberger v$.$ Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Inc. Landet Facts and Decision that hotele du RE the caso Duty Wars Business Insider to com tended Reason facity for a tha is w Now the latest ang stand out the theory of the the the Auto de Dout to particon in the Age of ca of these days the nem tettere ute and das Set Issue Date bubupote com of thu A D$$ H$$NH TH$$NH those who planned and med ett led Thus the Chutes and the off wedd the pledgeding David and it ased organism bless sh tina C hewan wild be able can the owne for That patrons might when The One also co dies in the purementoIT Sono $2018120951$ Case $5\mathrm{.}2$ Bogenberger v$.$ Pi Kappa Alpha Corporation, Inc. NEN $2015$ Facts David Bogenberger attended a pledge event at the Pi Decision Yes. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the interme$-$ Kappa Alpha fraternity house at Northern Illinois University $($NIU$).$ diate appellate court's reversal of the trial court's dismissal. The The NIU Chapter officers planned an evening of hazing, during plaintiff's complaint may proceed against the NIU Chapter which the pledges were required to consume vodka provided by fand its officers." the members. By the end of the night, David's blood alcohol level Reason Each of us owes a duty of care to others to guard was more than five times the legal limit $.$ He lost consciousness against injuries that are a reasonably foreseeable consequence The NIU Chapter officers failed to seek medical attention David of our acts. The court reasoned that an injury due to hazing is died during the night. His father, Gary $,$ filed a complaint in an Ili reasonably foreseeable. This is indicated by the existence of nois state court against the NIU Chapter and its officers, on a state hazing statutes, including Illinois's, the university's rules, theory of negligence. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants and the national Pi Kappa Alpha organization's policy against required the pledges, including David $,$ to participate in the pledge hazing. At hazing events involving the consumption of large event and to consume excessive and dangerous amounts of alco amounts of alcohol, injuries are likely to occur. The magnitude hal in violation of the state's hazing statute $*$ The court dismissed of the burden of guarding against such injuries is small. In this the complaint. A state intermediate appellate court reversed the case, then it is reasonable to require the NIU Chapter and its dismissal $.$ The defendants appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court officers to comply with the law, and the university's and frater$-$ Issue Did the NIU Chapter and its officers owe a duty of care to nity's rules. It is further reasonable to place the consequences of the pledges, including David, during the hazing event? that burden on the same parties$$those who planned car$-$ ried out the pledge event. Thus "the NIU Chapter and the offi$-$ separationed the NU and can get to be part time who partiopetudin cers owed a duty to the pledges, including David, and plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a claim for negligence against them."